LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWeb design by our team- 100% DB driven - please comment www.voidstudios.net
If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.
Results 1 to 10 of 18
Thread: Web Page Critique
-
May 06th, 2003, 10:33 AM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 18
- Member #
- 1304
Current Rating
Visual Appeal:0.0 out of 5
Accessibility:0.0 out of 5
Website Speed:0.0 out of 5
Compatibility:0.0 out of 5
Overall Rating:0.0 out of 5Rate This Site
Advertisement (login to hide this!)
You must be logged in to view this site
-
May 06th, 2003 10:33 AM
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:22 AM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 4,488
- Member #
- 735
Very nice! Clean design, the white bg for the text makes it stand out from the whole site.
Only crique I have is the mouseovers: on the left hand side, they are gray and make the links harder to see. On the menu items on the top, there are no mouseovers, and they would look nice there.
Also, the image on top is interesting, what's it supposed to be?
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:28 AM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Maryland, US
- Posts
- 11,774
- Member #
- 3
- Liked
- 21 times
Right. Mouseovers are supposed to make links clearer and stand out more, not hide them.
filburt1, Web Design Forums.net founder
Site of the Month contest: submit your site or vote for the winner!
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:36 AM #4
Nice work. Overall design is consistent, clean, and graphically unique. Thumbs up.
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:42 AM #5
Gotta agree with the rest. Very crisp, professional, but the mouseovers need tweaking.
The Rules
Was another WDF member's post helpful? Click the like button below the post.
Admin at houseofhelp.com
-
May 06th, 2003, 03:05 PM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 111
- Member #
- 1172
agreed appon.
http://www.macorastudios.com
-
May 06th, 2003, 08:09 PM #7Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 18
- Member #
- 1304
Thanks guys - I will see about changing the style for the links,
Graphic on top? - it's a fractal graphic done by me, oh about 3 years ago - I trew it in - and it stuck
-
May 06th, 2003, 10:03 PM #8Unpaid WDF Intern
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Not from USA
- Posts
- 14,482
- Member #
- 425
- Liked
- 2784 times
I like it. It's very clean. My only complaint (and a minor one) is that when the page is loading, the background for the text section remains the dark stripes so you get dark on dark, which is hard to read. It's not a problem once it's loaded but until then, it's a bugger.
If I've helped you out in any way, please pay it forward. My wife and I are walking for Autism Speaks. Please donate, and thanks.
If someone helped you out, be sure to "Like" their post and/or help them in kind. The "Like" link is on the bottom right of each post, beside the "Share" link.
My stuff (well, some of it): My bowling alley site | Canadian Postal Code Info (beta)
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:08 PM #9
Game,
The background shows like that because he's using databased content in nested HTML tables. So what happens is that the server-side script connects to the database and retrieves a recordset, then generates the HTML, which waits until the page generating done (because of the nested tables) to begin rendering any of the elements.
A good work-around for this is to use what I call "Stacked Tables" when you're using data-driven content. That way, each table (or div, if you're using stacked divs) will render once it's completely generated, not waiting for the rest.
You can make "Stacked Tables" by splitting up your content into 2 or more top-level tables (direct children of the body element). Typically you will see them as a "banner [+ top nav]" / "[side nav +] content" split.
-
May 06th, 2003, 11:09 PM #10
In the case of your site, Exodus, if you replace your outside table with <center></center> tags, it should fix your problem.
Reply With Quote
