Finished New Design

[tokkilee]

It validates as Strict...and is written in CSS...

[filburt1]

It's much more semantic. However:

1. It validates as HTML 4 Strict, which is ancient compared to XHTML 1.0 Strict (what you want).
2. The blockquotes are unnecessary. You're not quoting anything.

[tokkilee]

It's much more semantic. However:

1. It validates as HTML 4 Strict, which is ancient compared to XHTML 1.0 Strict (what you want).

*&@*$&*@$&@*@*&$@*$!!!!!!

i knew it was weird when it kept telling me to take off the close tags. I spent 14 hours working on this yesterday....i'll fix it later

[Karloff]

test it in IE6 aswell. menu ain't showing.

not keen on the type used, but the nav text should be increased. far too small.

enlarging you thumbnail images to use some of the white space would look better, imo

[tokkilee]

test it in IE6 aswell. menu ain't showing. I know....why is that?

not keen on the type used, but the nav text should be increased. far too small. i had it bigger but it looked out of place to me

enlarging you thumbnail images to use some of the white space would look better, imo...i just didnt want it to take up too much space

[tokkilee]

anybody else?

i've got most of the quirks worked out...a friend of mine helped...got the nav in ie6 to show up its just off a bit but he;s supposed to be looking into it..he also cleaned up my code a bit

[tokkilee]

I finally got everything fixed thanks to a few people on here and on another forum

[bensky]

nice, simple, love th illustration of the angel!