Hi All , I am working on a new web for a painting service
still working on it but tell me what you think
Colorama Painting
BTW this is an update for their website if you wanna check it
old colorama
thanx
Hi All , I am working on a new web for a painting service
still working on it but tell me what you think
Colorama Painting
BTW this is an update for their website if you wanna check it
old colorama
thanx
I like the illustrations but i reckon the buttons ya have on index page would look better if they just changed colour or something like that rather than moving to right aligned, maybe, i don't know. I like it though apart from that
Wow, that's a tiny site. I guess it says everything it's gotta say, though. Let's coin that as the "Business Card Style" of web design :-P
I give it a 4. Good job :-)
Excellent. 4 because of the iframe and I think the menu rollovers could be better.
JR
It's 'pretty' looking but a problem that you'll run in with that design is that it's difficult to convey a LOT of information...lot's of eye candy but very little content.Originally posted by farhaddad
Hi All , I am working on a new web for a painting service
still working on it but tell me what you think
Colorama Painting
BTW this is an update for their website if you wanna check it
old colorama
thanx
Regarding your navigation menu - why does the text shift to the left whenever my mouse hovers over it? What's the point of that? Maybe you should try another type of rollover effect?
i give it a fouri like it and like transio said business card style
![]()
looks cool i gave u a four because i don't like your roleovers.. they would look cool with a different colour background..
But overall you have done a gd redesign when compared to the old one lol![]()
Dream like you'll live forever. Live like you're gonna die 2morrow!
Same here im goin with kirman and transio. I give it a 4, looks good, but small and empty content wise. Rollovers would look good with a diff color instead of the text shift.
Jason Anderson
Grommet Designs
Web / Graphic Design
I would have given it a four, until I checked your source and saw all the frames you used to center the site. A table would be a much better way to center your site, it would load faster, be more compatible, and it wouldn't be frames!
arghhhhhh frames![]()
definately use tables they are loads better and so much more profesional![]()
frames = evil
Dream like you'll live forever. Live like you're gonna die 2morrow!
*Leaves site as he notices frames loading"
I don't like them, at all. I don't mind the implementation of the Iframe in the centre, but as kirman says - arghhhhhh frames![]()
justlivyalife - The future depends on what we do in the present. (Mahatma Gandhi)
WDF Resources: WDF Rules
Non-WDF: JavascriptSource | Dynamic Drive | phpBB | HTML-Kit | Winamp | Download Firefox | Morguefile